Plane crash map Locate crash sites, wreckage and more

N246JT accident description

North Carolina map... North Carolina list
Crash location 35.720000°N, 81.140000°W
Reported location is a long distance from the NTSB's reported nearest city. This often means that the location has a typo, or is incorrect.
Nearest city Long View, NC
34.475167°N, 78.202219°W
187.0 miles away
Tail number N246JT
Accident date 06 Jan 2015
Aircraft type Beech V35B
Additional details: None

NTSB Factual Report

On January 6, 2015, about 1710 eastern standard time, a Beech V35B, N246JT, operated by a private individual, was substantially damaged during a forced landing into trees in Long View, North Carolina, following a total loss of engine power during initial climb from Hickory Regional Airport (HKY), Hickory, North Carolina. The commercial pilot was seriously injured and the three passengers incurred minor injuries. The personal flight was conducted under the provisions of 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed and no flight plan was filed for the planned flight to Pitt-Greenville Airport (PGV), Greenville, North Carolina.

The pilot stated that during initial climb, about 300 feet above ground level, he heard a loud bang followed by a total loss of engine power. He subsequently performed a forced landing straight ahead into trees.

Examination of the wreckage by a Federal Aviation Administration inspector revealed substantial damage to the fuselage. The inspector also noted a hole in the engine case near the No. 2 cylinder.

A teardown examination of the engine was performed at a recovery facility, under the supervision of an NTSB investigator. The examination revealed that the lower rear crankshaft counterweight had separated and the No. 1 connecting rod separated. Oil was present throughout the engine and there was no evidence of lack of lubrication. The No. 2 cylinder, crankshaft, and camshaft could not be separated from the engine case half for examination due to rotational damage that occurred following the separation of the crankshaft counterweight. Those components were then forwarded to the manufacturer's facility for further examination as the teardown examination could not be completed at the recovery facility.

The subsequent examination at the manufacturer's facility was also performed under the supervision of an NTSB investigator. The examination revealed that all four snap rings from the lower rear crankshaft counterweight were found loose in the engine, and one of the rings had separated in half. Three of the lower rear counterweight retaining plates were found, but the fourth was not recovered. For comparison purposes, two snap rings were examined on the upper rear crankshaft counterweight. According to the manufacturer's mandatary service bulletin (MSB 99-3C), the minimum width between the snap ring ears must be 0.179 inch or more; a smaller width was indicative of a snap ring that was not properly seated in its groove. For one of the two upper rear counterweight snap rings, a 0.179 inch gap gauge could not be inserted as there was less than the prescribed space between the snap ring ears. However, when that snap ring was removed and its groove was cleaned of deposits by a wire brush, the snap ring then seated properly when reinstalled. Subsequently, the 0.179 inch gap gauge fit between the ears of the reinstalled snap ring.

Review of maintenance records revealed that the airplane's most recent annual inspection was completed on July 16, 2014. At that time, the airframe had accumulated 3,394 total hours of operation. The engine was a factory rebuild in 1998 and had accumulated 1,561 total hours at the time of the annual inspection. The airplane flew about 46 hours from the time of the inspection, until the accident.

Maintenance records show the engine received a top overhaul in 2006. The maintenance records also revealed that the crankshaft was inspection in June, 1999 in accordance with airworthiness directive 99-09-17. Continental Engines Service Bulletin MSB 99-3C states, "WARNING Do not use plates that have a loose fit. Failure to properly install counterweight retaining plates and snap rings may result in engine damage and possible failure."

NTSB Probable Cause

The improper installation of the lower rear crankshaft counterweight snap rings by unknown maintenance personnel, which resulted in the separation of the counterweight and a subsequent total loss of engine power during initial climb.

© 2009-2020 Lee C. Baker / Crosswind Software, LLC. For informational purposes only.